When the verdict in the Apple vs. Samsung trail came back so tight , despite having so many individual decisions to it , there was plenty of speculation that the panel might not have really cared or been inform . Jurors themselves are tell otherwise .
CNETandReutersreached out to two of the jurors , both of whom assert the verdict was n’t rush or made with any kind of vagueness . This was a very deliberate ruling , and they signify to send a content .
Juror Manuel Ilagan toldCNETthe following , when ask about specific instances of willful infringment :
Well , there were several . The einsteinium - post that go back and forth from Samsung execs about the Apple sport that they should incorporate into their devices was pretty damning to me . And also , on the last day , they showed the flick of the telephone that Samsung made before the iPhone come out and ones that they made after the iPhone come out . Some of the Samsung executive director they presented on video recording [ testimonial ] from Korea — I thought they were sidestep the question . They did n’t resolve one of them . They did n’t avail their movement . … We were n’t impatient . We wanted to do the correct matter , and not skip over any grounds . I suppose we were thoroughgoing .
panel foreman Velvin Hogan toldReutersthat it was “ perfectly ” reset the infringment was on purpose and that they “ did n’t want to give menu blanche to a troupe , by any name , to encroach someone else ’s cerebral property . ” [ CNETandReutersviaMac Rumors ]
AppleApple vs SamsungSamsung
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and acculturation intelligence in your inbox daily .
News from the futurity , delivered to your nowadays .
Please choose your desired newssheet and take your electronic mail to upgrade your inbox .
You May Also Like
